Cefepime-taniborbactam and CERTAIN-1: Can we treat carbapenem-resistant infections?

Wagenlehner and colleagues1 demonstrated non-inferiority and superiority with respect to a primary endpoint of composite success (microbiological plus clinical) of cefepime/taniborbactam vs. meropenem in treating complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis caused by carbapenem-susceptible gram-negative bacteria in adults. A major area of interest in real-world application of cefepime/taniborbactam is its potential role in treating carbapenem-resistant infections, which deserves further investigation.

Towards optimizing cefepime/tazobactam (WCK 4282) exposure to achieve efficacy against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections: dose recommendations for various renal functions, including intermittent haemodialysis, in healthy individuals.

OBJECTIVES: WCK 4282 is a novel combination of cefepime 2 g and tazobactam 2 g being developed for the treatment of infections caused by piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections. The dosing regimen for cefepime/tazobactam needs to be optimized to generate adequate exposures to treat infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens resistant to both cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam. METHODS: We developed pharmacokinetic population models of cefepime and tazobactam to evaluate the optimal dose adjustments in patients, including those with augmented renal clearance as well as various degrees of renal impairment, and also for those on intermittent haemodialysis. Optimal doses for various degrees of renal function were identified by determining the PTA for a range of MICs. To cover ESBL-producing pathogens with an cefepime/tazobactam MIC of 16 mg/L, a dosing regimen of 2 g q8h infused over 1.5 h resulted in a combined PTA of 99% for the mean murine 1 log10-kill target for the cefepime/tazobactam combination. RESULTS: We found that to adjust for renal function, doses need to be reduced to 1 g q8h, 500 mg q8h and 500 mg q12h for patients with CLCR of 30-59, 15-29 and 8-14 mL/min (as well as patients with intermittent haemodialysis), respectively. In patients with high to augmented CLR (estimated CLCR 120-180 mL/min), a prolonged 4 h infusion of standard dose is required. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested dosing regimens will result in exposures of cefepime and tazobactam that would be adequate for infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens with a cefepime/tazobactam MICs up to 16 mg/L.

Aetiology and use of antibiotics in pregnancy-related infections: results of the WHO Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS), 1-week inception cohort.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-related infections are important contributors to maternal sepsis and mortality. We aimed to describe clinical, microbiological characteristics and use of antibiotics by source of infection and country income, among hospitalized women with suspected or confirmed pregnancy-related infections. METHODS: We used data from WHO Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS) on maternal infections in hospitalized women, in 52 low-middle- and high-income countries conducted between November 28th and December 4th, 2017, to describe the frequencies and medians of maternal demographic, obstetric, and clinical characteristics and outcomes, methods of infection diagnosis and causative pathogens, of single source pregnancy-related infection, other than breast, and initial use of therapeutic antibiotics. We included 1456 women. RESULTS: We found infections of the genital (n = 745/1456, 51.2%) and the urinary tracts (UTI) (n = 531/1456, 36.5%) to be the most frequent. UTI (n = 339/531, 63.8%) and post-caesarean skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) (n = 99/180, 55.0%) were the sources with more culture samples taken and microbiological confirmations. Escherichia coli was the major uropathogen (n = 103/118, 87.3%) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 21/44, 47.7%) was the commonest pathogen in SSTI. For 13.1% (n = 191) of women, antibiotics were not prescribed on the same day of infection suspicion. Cephalosporins (n = 283/531, 53.3%) were the commonest antibiotic class prescribed for UTI, while metronidazole (n = 303/925, 32.8%) was the most prescribed for all other sources. Ceftriaxone with metronidazole was the commonest combination for the genital tract (n = 98/745, 13.2%) and SSTI (n = 22/180, 12.2%). Metronidazole (n = 137/235, 58.3%) was the most prescribed antibiotic in low-income countries while cephalosporins and co-amoxiclav (n = 129/186, 69.4%) were more commonly prescribed in high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in antibiotics used across countries could be due to availability, local guidelines, prescribing culture, cost, and access to microbiology laboratory, despite having found similar sources and pathogens as previous studies. Better dissemination of recommendations in line with antimicrobial stewardship programmes might improve antibiotic prescription.

Cerebrospinal fluid drain infection caused by pandrug-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis successfully treated with ceftaroline in combination with fosfomycin and vancomycin.

External ventricular drain-related cerebrospinal fluid infection represents a fearsome complication of neurosurgical interventions. Although vancomycin represents the standard of care for methicillin-resistant CoNS healthcare-associated ventriculitis, resistance phenomena have been described. We reported a case of a persistent external ventricular fluid drain infection after device removal by pandrug-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis successfully treated with intravenous ceftaroline in combination with fosfomycin and vancomycin. No evidence regarding pandrug-resistant S. epidermidis therapy currently exists to our knowledge. In this case, the S. epidermidis phenotype emerged during the therapy course, possibly due to initial device retention, biofilm formation and the host immune impaired response. Despite being poorly studied in vivo, ceftaroline may be considered an option when other alternatives are unavailable, thanks to its described activity against CoNS in vitro. This case extends the experience with ceftaroline for central nervous system infections suggesting it could also be used in high antimicrobial resistance settings for immunocompromised people.

Bone and Skin/Subcutaneous Tissue Concentrations of Cefiderocol During Treatment of Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Pyoderma gangrenosum is a rare dermatologic disorder that disrupts the skin barrier, requiring immunosuppressive therapy. We successfully used cefiderocol for the treatment of an extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia, and presumed osteomyelitis in a patient with severe pyoderma gangrenosum and associated immunosuppressive therapy while being medically optimized for skin grafting. We obtained bone and skin/subcutaneous tissue while the patient was on cefiderocol under an institutional review board-approved biologic waste recovery protocol. Cefiderocol concentrations in bone and skin/subcutaneous tissue were 13.9 and 35.9 mcg/g, respectively. The patient recovered from bacteremia and underwent autografting without further complications. Cefiderocol at approved dosing of 2 g IV (3-hour infusion) every 8 hours resulted in bone and skin/subcutaneous tissue concentrations adequate to treat extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria that remain susceptible to cefiderocol.

Are changes in antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations responsible for an increased risk of cefazolin allergy?

BACKGROUND: The first line of prevention of surgical site infection relies on the timely administration of antibiotic prophylaxis. First- and second-generation cephalosporins are the most recommended antibiotics in elective surgery. The incidence of cefazolin allergy has increased worldwide over the years. The sensitization mechanism of cefazolin is currently unknown, and data supporting cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins are lacking. Sensitization could occur through previous exposure either to cefazolin or to structurally related chemical agents. The objective of this study was to evaluate sensitization agents towards cefazolin. METHODS: The OpenBabel chemoinformatics toolbox was used to search for similarities between cefazolin and other molecules in an extensive drug database. Using the pholcodine-rocuronium similarity score as a threshold, we selected drugs with the most similar structure to that of cefazolin. Exposure to those drugs and cefazolin was assessed in a cohort of patients with skin test-proven cefazolin allergy at a specialized allergy centre via a self-administered anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: Using the pholcodine-rocuronium similarity score as a threshold (score≥0.7), 42 molecules were found to be similar to cefazolin (all cephalosporins). Only 8 were marketed in France. None of the 14 cefazolin-allergic patients who answered the questionnaire (65% female, median age 56 years) reported exposure to any identified antibiotics. In contrast, 11 (78%) had at least one previous surgery requiring cefazolin before the index case. CONCLUSION: Direct previous cefazolin exposure was identified in 78% of cefazolin-allergic patients. Cefazolin started to take a central place in antibiotic prophylaxis after 2010, when cefamandole usage decreased drastically. Changes in antibiotic prophylaxis over the past 14 years in France could have been the turning point for the increased incidence of cefazolin allergy.

Comparative efficacy and optimal duration of first-line antibiotic regimens for acute otitis media in children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 89 randomized clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic use for acute otitis media (AOM) is one of the major sources of antimicrobial resistance. However, the effective minimal antibiotic duration for AOM remains unclear. Moreover, guidelines often recommend broad ranges (5-10 days) of antibiotic use, yet the clinical impact of such a wide window has not been assessed. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from database inception to 6 October 2021. Network meta-analysis was conducted on randomized controlled trials that assessed antibiotic treatment for AOM in children (PROSPERO CRD42020196107). RESULTS: For amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate, 7-day regimens were noninferior to 10-day regimens in clinical responses [amoxicillin: risk ratio (RR) 0.919 (95% CI 0.820-1.031), amoxicillin-clavulanate: RR 1.108 (0.957-1.282)], except for ≤ 2 years. For the third-generation cephalosporins, 7-day and 10-day regimens had similar clinical responses compared to placebo [7-day: RR 1.420 (1.190-1.694), 10-day: RR 1.238 (1.125-1.362) compared to placebo]. However, 5-day regimens of amoxicillin-clavulanate and third-generation cephalosporins were inferior to 10-day regimens. Compared to amoxicillin, a shorter treatment duration was tolerable with amoxicillin-clavulanate. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that 10 days of antibiotic use may be unnecessarily long, while the treatment duration should be longer than 5 days. Otherwise, 5-day regimens would be sufficient for a modest treatment goal. Our findings revealed that the current wide range of recommended antibiotic durations may have influenced the clinical outcome of AOM, and a narrower antibiotic duration window should be re-established.

Efficacy, safety, and tissue penetration of solithromycin in Japanese patients with otorhinolaryngological infections.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tissue penetration of solithromycin for the treatment of otorhinolaryngological infections, we conducted three studies: a tissue penetration study with patients scheduled to undergo otorhinolaryngological tissue removal, an open-label study comprising patients with otitis media, pharyngitis, laryngitis, and tonsillitis, and a non-inferiority study compared with high-dose cefcapene-pivoxil (CFPN-PI). METHODS: Tissue penetration study; 17 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic otitis media, chronic tonsillitis, or palatine tonsillar hypertrophy, who required resection or removal of their tissue, were enrolled. Solithromycin was administered orally, and otorhinolaryngological tissues were collected 3.5-6 h after drug administration; blood was collected within 15 min before and after drug administration. The collected tissues and blood concentrations were measured at a central laboratory. Open-label study; 55 patients who were diagnosed with acute otitis media, laryngopharyngitis, or tonsillitis were enrolled. Solithromycin was administered orally 800 mg on Day 1, while on days 2-7, 400 mg of the drug was administered once daily. The primary endpoint is the clinical response at Test-of-Cure (TOC: 5-10 days after completion) Non-inferiority study; 283 patients with acute rhinosinusitis or acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis were randomized into either the solithromycin group or CFPN-PI group. Solithromycin was administered 800 mg once daily on Day 1 and 400 mg once daily while on Days 2-7 in solithromycin group, and CFPN-PI was administered 150 mg three times a day while on Days 1-7 in CFPN-PI group. The primary endpoint is the clinical response at TOC. RESULTS: In the tissue penetration study, the tissue concentration ratios (tissue concentration/plasma concentration) of solithromycin were 4.19 in the sinonasal mucosa, 1.33 in the middle ear mucosa, and 6.12 in the palatine tonsil tissue. In the open-label study, the efficacy rates at the TOC were 97.0 % for acute otitis media, 100 % for laryngopharyngitis, and 81.8 % for tonsillitis. In the non-inferiority study comprising patients with rhinosinusitis, the efficacy rate at the TOC was 87.7 % for solithromycin and 89.7 % for CFPN-PI. The difference in the efficacy rate (95 % confidence interval) was -2.0 % (-9.4 % to 5.4 %), verifying the non-inferiority of solithromycin to CFPN-PI. The most common adverse events in patients administered solithromycin were diarrhea (20.7 %), nausea and nasopharyngitis (3.6 %,), pharyngitis and elevated hepatic function test results (3.1 %), and abnormal hepatic function (2.1 %). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings, it is suggested that solithromycin is useful for the treatment of otorhinolaryngological infections.

A Process Improvement Project to Increase Compliance With Cephalosporin-based Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Children With Non-severe Penicillin Allergies.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Cephalosporins are considered safe and first-line prophylaxis in children with non-severe penicillin allergies. However, use of second-line agents is common and is primarily driven by poor allergic response documentation and misunderstanding of cross-reactivity risk. The goal of this project was to improve compliance with cephalosporin prophylaxis through improved documentation and targeted educational efforts. METHODS: A multidisciplinary working group including representatives from allergy, surgery, infectious disease, and pharmacy developed staged interventions to facilitate compliance with cephalosporin prophylaxis. These included: (1) caregiver outreach to clarify incomplete allergy documentation, (2) a decision-support algorithm for prophylaxis use in penicillin-allergic patients, (3) standardized educational resources for surgical faculty and rotating trainees, (4) email reminders with prophylaxis recommendations sent out prior to scheduled cases, and (5) EMR-based decision support during antibiotic ordering. Rates of complete allergy documentation and cephalosporin utilization were compared for general surgery procedures between a 12-month pre-intervention and 14-month post-intervention period. RESULTS: 578 patients with penicillin allergies recorded in the EMR were included (301 pre-intervention and 277 post-intervention), 54.0% of which received prophylaxis. Compared to the pre-intervention period, complete documentation of allergic reactions increased from 57.1% to 84.2% (p < 0.001) following implementation of all interventions. Appropriate prophylaxis utilization increased from 34.5% to 88.5% following implementation of all interventions (p < 0.001), and evidence of a stepwise increase in appropriate utilization was evident with each intervention stage. Persistent compliance failures during the post-implementation period were most commonly associated with urgent and emergent add-on cases. No adverse events or allergic responses were reported before or after project implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with cephalosporin prophylaxis significantly improved following a multidisciplinary effort targeting education, allergy documentation, and clinical support at the point of care. Ongoing efforts include postoperative audits within 24 h for noncompliant cases in order to identify barriers and improve compliance for urgent and emergent add-on cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective.

Real-life use of ceftobiprole for severe infections in a French intensive care unit.

Ceftobiprole (CBP) is an anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) cephalosporin with a wide spectrum of activity. We aimed to describe our experience of real-life use of CBP for the treatment of severe infections of critically ill patients with multiple infected sites and related trough CBP concentrations. We performed a retrospective, observational, monocentric study in our intensive care unit (ICU) that included all patients treated with CBP for documented infections between January 2016 and December 2021. We collected demographic, clinical, and microbiological data. When available, we report the CBP trough concentrations. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at the end of treatment. The secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and documentation of the carriage of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria not present before CBP treatment. Between January 2016 and December 2021, 47 patients were treated in the ICU with CBP. The main indication for treatment was pneumonia (51%) and most patients presented with associated bacteremia (72%). All infections were polymicrobial. A clinical cure was achieved for nearly 80% of the patients. Only five patients presented new carriage of MDR bacteria. In-hospital mortality was 32%. Out of 21 strains of Enterobacterales for which the MIC was available, 33% were considered to be resistant to CBP according to the EUCAST 2023 clinical breakpoint. Trough CBP concentrations were reported for 16 patients. In our real-life experience, treatment of ICU patients with CBP for polymicrobial severe infections resulted in most cases in a clinical cure. Monitoring of trough concentrations is critical, especially in cases of high MIC.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Intravenous Push Cefepime in Burn Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance.

Patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) are a subset of critically ill patients including burn patients that exhibit increased renal elimination of medications beyond that of similarly injured patients. Currently approved maximum regimens of medications primarily eliminated by the kidney, such as cefepime (>90% unchanged in the urine), may be inadequate (eg, compromising the bactericidal activity of cefepime) in patients with ARC. Due to recent resource limitations, centers have changed infusion practices of commonly prescribed medications to intravenous push (IVP), potentially exacerbating the problem of maintaining bactericidal cefepime concentrations. The hypothesis of the study was patients with ARC are not currently achieving adequate target attainment, when receiving cefepime 2 g every 8 h IVP. Eight blood samples were collected from each patient, and concentrations measured via LC-MS/MS. WinNonlin (version 8.3) was used to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters of cefepime and simulate plasma concentrations of cefepime in each of the ten subjects. Simulations of cefepime plasma concentrations produced by a 2 g dose given every 8 h and a 1 g dose given every 4 h were performed and the time above a MIC of 4 mg/L, 8 mg/L, and 16 mg/L compared. The 2 g every 8 h regimen remained above the breakpoints for 92%, 85%, and 71% of the dosing interval, respectively. The 1 g every 4 h regimen remained above the same breakpoints at a frequency of 100%, 99%, and 92% of the dosing interval. Giving cefepime 1 g every 4 h is a simple approach to increase the likelihood of maintaining the optimal bactericidal activity of cefepime in patients with ARC.

Early picc-line infections in non-neutropenic patients are mainly due to E. coli suggesting that third-generation cephalosporin may be used as a first-line antibiotic therapy.

PURPOSE: To describe the rate of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) -associated bloodstream infections, and the pathogens involved. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed data collected from all adult patients with a PICC insertion in a hematology unit in a tertiary care center between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 370 PICCs were inserted in 275 patients with hematological malignancies: 54 (15 %) confirmed cases of central-line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) were identified. Enterobacteria were the most frequent bacteria identified, involved in 35 % of CLABSIs. Group 1 enterobacteria bacteremia occurred a much shorter time after insertion (median time to CLABSI 16 days) than group 2 or group 3 enterobacteria (median time to CLABSI 64 days, p-value = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Among Gram-negative bacilli CLABSI among non-neutropenic patients, E. coli identification was the most frequent and occurred earlier after insertion, suggesting that third-generation cephalosporin may be used as a first-line antibiotic therapy for enterobacteria bacteremia among non-neutropenic patients.

Moving towards a standardized definition of antimicrobial resistance: a comparison of the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) versus multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates (CANWARD, 2016-2021).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates demonstrating difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes were evaluated by broth microdilution. Susceptibility was lower for all antimicrobials versus DTR relative to MDR isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and imipenem-relebactam susceptibility was 35.9%, 64.5%, and 47.0% for DTR isolates and 60.5%, 80.6%, and 71.5% for MDR isolates.

Impact of pH on the activity of novel cephalosporin cefiderocol in human urine.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial activity of antibiotics can be impacted by pH, enhancing or reducing their bactericidal properties. Cefiderocol, a novel cephalosporin antibiotic that is among others indicated for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), lacks data on activity in urine. METHODS: Pooled human urine (iron levels ∼0.05 mg/L/24 h), CAMHB and iron-depleted CAMHB (ID-CAMHB) at pH 5, 7 and 8 served as media. MIC testing was done according to EUCAST with the broth microdilution method for 17 clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and ATCC 25922 (including isolates with ESBL activity), 17 clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and ATCC 700603 (also with ESBL), and 6 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and ATCC 27853. Time-kill curves (TKCs) were performed for selected strains at pH 5, 7 and 8 in urine. RESULTS: MIC values in urine, CAMHB and ID-CAMHB exhibited isolate-specific variations when assessed under identical pH conditions, ranging from a 1-fold dilution to changes of up to 4-fold dilutions in either direction. Median MICs of cefiderocol were up to 50-fold higher in pH 5 than in pH 7 for P. aeruginosa isolates and 32-fold higher in E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates. TKCs with 650 and 1300 mg/L cefiderocol in urine showed that ATCC strains were efficiently eradicated despite the pH set. CONCLUSIONS: Acidic pH had a significant negative impact on cefiderocol activity. Yet, after a recommended IV administration of 2 g cefiderocol every 8 h, a concentration of approximately 1300 mg/L can be achieved in urine, suggesting that efficient killing of all tested pathogens could have been possible even under acidic conditions in vivo.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol and other newly approved antimicrobials against multi-drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens recovered in intensive care units in Spain and Portugal.

OBJECTIVE: The antimicrobial resistance is a significant public health threat, particularly for healthcare-associated infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens which are increasingly reported worldwide. The aim of this study was to provide data on the in vitro antimicrobial activity of cefiderocol and that of commercially available comparator antibiotics against a defined collection of recent clinical multi-drug resistant (MDR) microorganisms, including carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria collected from different regions in Spain and Portugal. METHODS: A total of 477 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were prospectively (n=265) and retrospectively (n=212) included (2016-2019). Susceptibility testing was performed using standard broad microdilution and results were interpreted using CLSI-2021 and EUCAST-2021 criteria. RESULTS: Overall, cefiderocol showed a good activity against Enterobacterales isolates, being 99.5% susceptible by CLSI and 94.5% by EUCAST criteria. It also demonstrated excellent activity against P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia isolates, all being susceptible to this compound considering CLSI breakpoints. Regarding A. baumannii (n=64), only one isolate was resistant to cefiderocol. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are in agreement with other studies performed outside Spain and Portugal highlighting its excellent activity against MDR gram-negative bacteria. Cefiderocol is a therapeutic alternative to those available for the treatment of infections caused by these MDR bacteria.

Prescribing Pattern and Efficacy of Oral Antibiotics for Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections in Japan: A Descriptive Study Using a Nationwide Claims Database.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric urinary tract infections are often treated with third-generation cephalosporins; however, the increasing prevalence of Escherichia coli resistant to cephalosporins has reduced their effectiveness. Although resistance is prevalent in Asia, the prescribing patterns and clinical effectiveness of antibiotics have mostly been reported in the United States. This study aimed to describe the prescription patterns and effectiveness of oral antibiotics for treating pediatric urinary tract infections in Japan. METHODS: This descriptive study used data from a nationwide Japanese claims database. We identified patients <6 years old with urinary tract infections who received oral antibiotics between January 2016 and December 2020. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess prescription patterns. Moreover, logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for treatment failure among the commonly prescribed antibiotics and patient characteristics. Treatment failure was defined as the prescription of different antibiotics within 7 days of the primary prescription. RESULTS: Of the 4,127 patients, 2,766 (67.0%) were prescribed third-generation cephalosporins, and 347 (8.4%) were prescribed amoxicillin. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and amoxicillin-clavulanate were prescribed to 63 (1.5%) and 50 (1.2%) patients, respectively. Treatment failure was observed in 118 (2.9%) patients and more often in amoxicillin-treated patients than in cefcapene pivoxil-treated patients [OR, 2.18 (95% CI: 1.04-4.58)]. CONCLUSIONS: Third-generation cephalosporins are the most commonly prescribed antibiotics for the initial therapy of pediatric urinary tract infections in Japan. Third-generation cephalosporins are still effective in Japan, despite the high prevalence of resistance against cephalosporins.

Outcomes after treatment of nonsevere gram-negative clinical mastitis with ceftiofur hydrochloride for 2 or 5 days compared with negative control.

A study was conducted at 3 commercial dairies in California to compare outcomes of treating nonsevere (mild and moderate) gram-negative (GN) clinical mastitis (CM) with intramammary (IMM) ceftiofur HCl (125 mg of ceftiofur HCl per tube) in either 2-d (SP2) or 5-d (SP5) treatment programs compared with nontreatment (CON). In addition, we contrasted results from cases classified as mild and moderate. Four hundred fifteen cases were included in the final dataset, including 135 CON, 133 SP2, and 147 SP5. Milk from quarters with CM was sampled for on-farm culture (OFC) to differentiate gram-positive (GP) and GN bacteria, with results known within 24 h. Those with GN infections were randomly assigned to experimental groups, while those with GP, mixed infections, and contaminated samples did not continue in the study and received standard farm therapy. For cows with GN infections, a sample was submitted for MALDI-TOF assay. Only nonsevere cases were enrolled, and all quarters yielded monocultures of GN species. Clinical scores were obtained 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, 21, and 28 ± 3 d relative to enrollment. Milk samples were collected from quarters 14, 21, and 28 ± 3 d after enrollment, and submitted for routine culture and, when appropriate, submitted to MALDI-TOF evaluation. For many response criteria, there were significant interactions between treatments and CM severity scores at the time of enrollment, with effectiveness of ceftiofur HCl treatment being more beneficial compared with CON as mastitis clinical severity increased. While most treatment responses were significant for animals with mild or moderate GN mastitis, the largest responses were noted among cows with moderate CM cases.

Cephalosporin resistance, tolerance, and approaches to improve their activities.

Cephalosporins comprise a ß-lactam antibiotic class whose first members were discovered in 1945 from the fungus Cephalosporium acremonium. Their clinical use for Gram-negative bacterial infections is widespread due to their ability to traverse outer membranes through porins to gain access to the periplasm and disrupt peptidoglycan synthesis. More recent members of the cephalosporin class are administered as last resort treatments for complicated urinary tract infections, MRSA, and other multi-drug resistant pathogens, such as Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Unfortunately, there has been a global increase in cephalosporin-resistant strains, heteroresistance to this drug class has been a topic of increasing concern, and tolerance and persistence are recognized as potential causes of cephalosporin treatment failure. In this review, we summarize the cephalosporin antibiotic class from discovery to their mechanisms of action, and discuss the causes of cephalosporin treatment failure, which include resistance, tolerance, and phenomena when those qualities are exhibited by only small subpopulations of bacterial cultures (heteroresistance and persistence). Further, we discuss how recent efforts with cephalosporin conjugates and combination treatments aim to reinvigorate this antibiotic class.